On 2/21/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All of the above tags were disparaged in the <wicket:component> vote. > Are any other tags all but deprecated? The following are all clearly > standard tags. > > wicket:border > wicket:child > wicket:extend > wicket:message > wicket:panel > > What about > > wicket:link
That one is fine. I used to be against adopting it, but lost the vote, and now that it is in I'm not voting it out again :) For simple situations or situations where you use a lot of bookmarkable pages, <wicket:link> can be quite convenient. > In particular, which tags (apart from component, container & pseudo) > would I be best off avoiding? None that I know off. In fact, I lost track and hardly have an idea what container and pseudo really do and whether they are officially in the code base now. Maybe the committers who are responsible here could clarify this? Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
