i think one is protected because that one has an alternative isVisibleInHierarchy()
johan
On 10/26/06,
ChuckDeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am defining a panel, which is visible only if at least one of its children
is visible. So, it's isVisble() method calls visitChildren() with a visitor
that returns true as soon as it finds a visible child or null otherwise.
This worked until I started using an AuthorizationStrategy, now I also need
to check isRenderAllowed(), but it is protected. I looked at
isVisibleInHierarchy(), but it goes through the component's ancestors and,
in my case, causes an infinite loop.
So, why is isRenderAllowed() protected when isEnabledAllowed() is public?
or maybe a better question
Is there a better way to do this visibility check?
Thanks
Chuck
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/why-is-isRenderAllowed%28%29-protected--tf2514044.html#a7011351
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
