well, my experience is: if you put anything online, someone will come and
try to skrew it up :/ 

because of that, I see anything client side just as a "gimmick" and regard
all data coming from it as potential dangerous... 

but helping users is also ok :P

Regards

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag 
> von Pierre-Yves Saumont
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 15:51
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] progress indicator
> 
> Well, technically, you're right. However, I think we are 
> speaking of different use cases. My use case is a fair user 
> wanting to click on an link and not aware that he has to wait 
> for the result. So he might click a second time if he's 
> waiting too long. For this use case, we often see a message 
> that says "Wait for the answer. Do not click twice or your 
> order (or whatever) will be processed twice".
> 
> In that use case, I think "Ajax" can help. (By the way, it is 
> client side processing. Nothing to do with Ajax).
> 
> Your use case is more an unfair user trying to screw the 
> system. In that case, I will of course try to install 
> protections on the system side, but I will not try to protect 
> the user. ;-)
> 
> Pierre-Yves
> 
> Korbinian Bachl a écrit :
> > it wouldnt work to prevent the user from doing sth. -  even 
> if he has 
> > JS enabled, he might abuse it... ajax has always be treatet as 
> > unsecure... and the basic problem the thread started with, cant be 
> > solved by ajax, it has to be solved by the server checking 
> the current 
> > state of the process thats going on...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von 
> >> Pierre-Yves Saumont
> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 13:16
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] progress indicator
> >>
> >> What wouldn't work? Do you mean the indicating ajax link wouldn't 
> >> prevent the user to resubmit the form, or are you thinking about 
> >> another problem?
> >>
> >> Pierre-Yves
> >>
> >> Korbinian Bachl a écrit :
> >>> depends on the scenario he wants to use it, however, 
> preventing the 
> >>> user to send a form just wouldnt work
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>>
> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im 
> Auftrag von 
> >>>> Pierre-Yves Saumont
> >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 11:29
> >>>> An: [email protected]
> >>>> Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] progress indicator
> >>>>
> >>>> I guess the question is how to prevent the user to send the form 
> >>>> twice while the Ajax request is being processed. Or am I wrong?
> >>>>
> >>>> Pierre-Yves
> >>>>
> >>>> Korbinian Bachl a écrit :
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> i dont understand what you mean? - how can a disabled
> >>>> onSubmit button
> >>>>> stop the user from changing selected values?? if you 
> plan it ajax 
> >>>>> like, how can u be secure that the user has JS activated
> >> and doenst
> >>>>> deactivate it or ignore parts of it (like you can do with
> >>>> certain browser plugins) ?
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> basically, a check on a user side (in the browser) is a
> >>>> toy, but not a
> >>>>> check - you can help the user to fill out forms and tell
> >>>> him he shoud
> >>>>> do this and that, but you cant force him nor be sure that
> >>>> the data hes
> >>>>> sending is trustful in any way...
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> ----------
> >>>>>     *Von:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Im
> >>>> Auftrag von
> >>>>>     *Nino Wael
> >>>>>     *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 10:54
> >>>>>     *An:* [email protected]
> >>>>>     *Betreff:* [Wicket-user] progress indicator
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     We have a form where we would like to disable the
> >> complete form
> >>>>>     onsubmit so that the user cant change any of his
> >>>> selected values and
> >>>>>     we would like to display a progress meter(it does not
> >>>> have to show
> >>>>>     the actual progress just a gif like the AJAX examples). 
> >>>> I have been
> >>>>>     thinking of the AJAX examples but I guess that since
> >> we somehow
> >>>>>     would like to stall the browser it’s not really a good
> >>>> solution, we
> >>>>>     would have to add all for components again just
> >>>> disabled and then on
> >>>>>     the end of the ajax call add them all again enabled?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     Whats your 2 centavos on this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>>> --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> >>>>> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance
> >> to share
> >>>>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief
> >> surveys -- and
> >>>>> earn cash
> >>>>>
> >> 
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DE
> >>>> V
> >>>>> DEV
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -----------
> >>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> >>>> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the 
> chance to share 
> >>>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief 
> surveys -- and 
> >>>> earn cash 
> >>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge
> >>> &CID=DEVDEV
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -----------
> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> >> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> >> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and 
> >> earn cash 
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge
> > &CID=DEVDEV
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to 
> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief 
> surveys -- and earn cash 
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge
&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to