Brilliant! I'll definitely try out this patch. On 9 Jun 2006, at 12:21, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Sorry, we (comitters) couldn't come to an agreement. Backporting > deferring the session creation can be done in 1.2 (in fact, it's > working on my laptop now), but it means two API breaks: > IBehavior get additional method isStateless, and ISessionStore has > method getSessionId(Request, boolean) instead of > getSessionId(Request). One of the comitters felt the API break > voilates our promise of not doing API breaks for .x.x versions. > > I'm attaching this patch for those of you that really need it badly. > Hopefully, this patch will make it in 1.3 if/when we are going to > release that, and it is in 2.0 now. > > Eelco > > > On 6/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yeah, it's in 2.0. We're having the - heated - discussion about >> backporting it so that it will be available in 1.2. >> >> Eelco >> >> >> On 6/8/06, Michael Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I thought that was the point of 2.0--to break the API for a better >> > product. =D >> > >> > Michael Day >> > >> > On Jun 8, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote: >> > >> > > I'm just about to check in changes that - finally - lets >> Wicket defer >> > > session creation until it is actually needed. The change is >> done for >> > > 2.0/ trunk, but we're currently voting on whether it is worth >> an API >> > > break. IBehavior has one additional method. If you haven't been >> > > reading the API docs not to implement that interface directly >> (and I >> > > wouldn't know any advantage to do that), it means you don't >> have a >> > > drop in. >> > > >> > > So before you do a lot of work, you might want to wait until >> we're >> > > done voting. >> > > >> > > Eelco >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 6/8/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> On 8 Jun 2006, at 09:52, Johan Compagner wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> you could return your own versions of ISessionStore >> > >>> that pretty much doesn't do anything.. >> > >>> Dont know if that always works.. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, I think I will try this approach and see what >> happens! I >> > >> will be building a new site in the next month or two which >> will be a >> > >> good experiment. If it all works out I will convert the rest >> of my >> > >> main site from Webwork to Wicket. I want to wait for 2.0 to >> become a >> > >> little more stable first and base it on that. >> > >> >> > >> John. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> Wicket-user mailing list >> > >> [email protected] >> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Wicket-user mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wicket-user mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >> > >> >> <wicket-1.2.patch.txt> >> <wicket-examples-1.2.patch.txt> > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
