On 9/22/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what do you mean inspect? the attribute modifier itself can perform the > attribute replacement/i18n, why should this be any different then regular > ams - excpet that this one is stateless/singleton. statelesness is a > property of the behavior. > > the reason requiredvalidator.instance() is gone is that required validator > itself is gone, there is nothing stopping you from sharing behaviors that > are meant to be stateless across component instances.
Huh? We are talking about different things here. If you read back a couple of posts you'll see Juergen say: > What if the Message markup filter (which is only executed when the > markup is loaded) were able to add a stateless attributemodifier to > the component tag and that AM gets automatically attached to the > component at render time. I was talking about how a behavior would automatically get attached to components. In order to achieve that, I think the render process should somewhere inspect the tags and recognize there are behaviors to be attached. Note the 'I *think*' part, as I was asking Juergen whether that was what he had in mind. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
