I think what Cameron means - and I agree with that - is that it would
be very convenient to be able to register everything in a package with
one command. Of course, the /implementation/ of that command is to
scan the package and register every resource found one at a time.

Eelco


On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but at what time do you want to do it?
> Because that has to be done anyway..
> 
> I still don't see why a String (staticroot) would help you with that
> instead of just directly use the Dojo.class
> 
> johan
> 
> 
> Cameron Braid wrote:
> > Its just a pain to have to register EVERY SINGLE static resource.
> >
> > Cameron
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-develop-
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johan Compagner
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 6 September 2005 7:19 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [Wicket-develop] Ideas for better Dojo support
> >>
> >> why register a folder?
> >> why not just use the class itself (as scope)
> >> because as far as i can see that is what you want.
> >> You want the package == scope == the Dojo.class
> >>
> >> johan
> >>
> >>
> >> Cameron Braid wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think that being able to register a folder, and optionally a filter,
> >>>
> >> to
> >>
> >>> export a folder of static resources would still be a good idea.
> >>>
> >>> Cameron
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-
> >>>>
> >> develop-
> >>
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 6 September 2005 6:08 PM
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Wicket-develop] Ideas for better Dojo support
> >>>>
> >>>> With other javascript/ css dependencies (like with the DatePicker) the
> >>>> relative resolving works. As long as all dependencies are
> >>>> pre-registered. This could be more elagant, agreed on that. It should
> >>>> be easy to scan a package and automatically register the resources we
> >>>> find in it based on e.g. extensions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do you want to use an initializer? This looks like more work. If
> >>>> you use AjaxHandlers, like DojoAjaxHandler, the registering and header
> >>>> contribution is done automatically for you. And there is a seperation
> >>>> between contributions that should be done once (the static .js file
> >>>> includes) and contributions that should be done for every ajax
> >>>> handler. Doesn't this suit your needs? And if not, what do you find
> >>>> inconvenient in our ajax handler pattern?
> >>>>
> >>>> Eelco
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> >>>> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> >>>> Practices
> >>>> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing &
> >>>>
> >> QA
> >>
> >>>> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
> >>>>
> >> http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> >>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> >>> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> >>>
> >> Practices
> >>
> >>> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing &
> >>>
> >> QA
> >>
> >>> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
> >>>
> >> http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> >>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Wicket-develop mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> >> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> >> Practices
> >> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> >> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wicket-develop mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
> > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to