I'm another that looks for documentation and examples when
investigating new things.  I'm not saying we need a formal/paper book
(although they have their uses - my most recent purchase was a paper
copy of Matt Raible's "Spring Live",) but I want something with at
least a "Table of Contents" and a progression from beginning to an end
(or at least a stage where a basic but usable web-app has been
described).

  I'm obviously keen on Wiki's, but would put an on-line manual higher
as I want a tutorial to take me through various aspects, and the
step-by-step approach tends ensures that there's no slight-of-hand
going on anywhere, where there's too big a jump from one example to
another.

  One of the the reasons I went for Dokuwiki was that it should lend
itself to developing a manual/tutorial in the Wiki, though!

Gwyn

On 4/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Never say never, rember that quote?
> 
> Well Gilli, I may be in a minority of one but I do use manuals and books. 
> They are very important to me. I learn a lot from
> them.
> However, before talking about books let's create a great Tutorial about 
> wicket and develop more examples (agreed).
> I think the original tutorial released by Jonathan was great and we should 
> revise and improve it.
> Acticles, even just one pagers posted by the core team would be greatly 
> appreciated. Sometimes just an explanation of an
> idea that was or is going to be introduced into Wicket is great. That helps 
> in understanding of a new code introduced into
> Wicket.
> But above all, now that wicket is beginning to be checked out by more people 
> small tutorials are a must.
> Les
> 
> ----------------
> Gilli wrote:
> 
> On 14 Apr 2005, at 16:38, Gili wrote:
> 
>         I've read this quote a lot in the past and I think now is a good time 
> to repeat it: "Users don't read manuals!" We want
> them, but never really read them. I know this is true for me... I read the 
> online Wicket manual cover to cover back when it
> was up-to-date and in retrospect I would have much preferred a solid Wiki 
> knowledge base.
> 
>         My 2 cents is: instead of a online manual which people read from 
> cover to cover (no one really wants that anyway)
> provide users with two things:
> 
> 1) Wicket-examples (but more of them)
> 2) Wiki knowledge base, i.e. "how to do this in Wicket..."
> 
>         A formal book is only needed if you want to sell it offline as a form 
> of making money or something but it is utterly
> useless online.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to