Is there any case where rainRate will be > 0, but rain = 0 for a time 
period?

What do  sum, count, wsum, sumtime account for in the rainRate table?

I suspect that if these values are off in the archive table, is a safe to 
assume that they are off in the archive_day_rain table as well?  Should i 
rebuild the daily summaries as part of this cleanup also?

Thanks,

On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 9:32:44 PM UTC-6 vince wrote:

> Each will be so fast running a couple commands won’t take long..
>
> On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 7:58:36 PM UTC-7 Thomas Carlin wrote:
>
>> I also ran the queries below.  Obviously all the archive records that 
>> relate to the records in my original post need to be updated, but is it 
>> safe to assume that all of the records that are in these queries will need 
>> to be updated as well, or is there a case where rainRate > 0 but rain=0.0?
>>
>> sqlite> select count(*) from archive where rainRate > 0 and rain=0.0;
>> count(*)
>> 4464
>> sqlite> select count(*) from archive where rainRate > 0 and rain is NULL;
>> count(*)
>> 185
>> sqlite> select count(*) from archive where rain is NULL;
>> count(*)
>> 317
>>
>> These are easy, I expect, to fix, i expect.  Simply:
>> update archive set rain=0.0 where rain is NULL;
>> update archive set rainRate = 0 where rainRate > 0 AND rain=0.0;
>>
>> Is there a better way to fix all these things in one shot?
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 8:39:06 PM UTC-6 Thomas Carlin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All! I've been playing with some skin modifications on my weather 
>>> station again, and found some strange values in a few tables.  Most of them 
>>> i have been able to clean up without any issue, but I feel like there is 
>>> more to the rainRate table.  
>>>
>>> I found the following table of values, obviously the min and max are 
>>> false.  I can't however reason out how, if at all the sum, count, wsum 
>>> relate to the other values.  
>>>
>>> What is the best way to clear out these bad values?  I am guessing on 
>>> some of the min values, I already ran an update command before pulling this 
>>> full list, and because i live dangerously, didn't pull a backup first, but 
>>> i do know that the first 10 entries are 100 percent accurate.
>>>
>>> sqlite> select * from archive_day_rainRate where max >10;
>>> dateTime|min|mintime|max|maxtime|sum|count|wsum|sumtime
>>>
>>> 1605164400|0.0|1605164402|655.350000000001|1605188100|2136.40082144|287|640920.246432|86100
>>>
>>> 1618898400|0.0|1618898403|655.350000000001|1618930800|26711.4767995|288|8013443.03985|86400
>>>
>>> 1643439600|0.0|1643439601|655.350000000001|1643465400|2551.68191489362|244|765504.574468086|73200
>>>
>>> 1645513200|0.0|1645513203|655.350000000001|1645584600|31106.9906622517|287|9332097.19867551|86100
>>>
>>> 1645599600|0.0|1645599603|655.350000000001|1645680600|8779.61978259878|288|2633885.93477963|86400
>>> 1662703200|0.0|1662703202|655.350000000001|1662706200|40020.4846440398 
>>> <(484)%20644-0398>|288|12006145.3932119|86400
>>>
>>> 1668150000|0.0|1668150004|655.350000000001|1668153600|8030.40075523906|254|2409120.22657172|76200
>>> 1668754800|655.35|1668817498|655.35|1668817498|655.35|1|196605.0|300
>>> 1668841200|655.35|1668856799|655.35|1668856799|1966.05|3|589815.0|900
>>> 1668927600|655.35|1668940798|655.35|1668940798|2621.4|4|786420.0|1200
>>> 1669014000|655.35|1669023898|655.35|1669023898|3932.1|6|1179630.0|1800
>>> 1669100400|655.35|1669109698|655.35|1669109698|4587.45|7|1376235.0|2100
>>> 1669186800|655.35|1669187699|655.35|1669187699|6553.5|10|1966050.0|3000
>>> 1669273200|655.35|1669278900|655.35|1669278900|7208.85|11|2162655.0|3300
>>> 1669359600|655.35|1669365300|655.35|1669365300|7864.2|12|2359260.0|3600
>>> 1669446000|655.35|1669451697|655.35|1669451697|7208.85|11|2162655.0|3300
>>> 1669532400|655.35|1669536899|655.35|1669536899|9830.25|15|2949075.0|4500
>>> 1669618800|655.35|1669620000|655.35|1669620000|9174.9|14|2752470.0|4200
>>> 1669705200|655.35|1669719897|655.35|1669719897|9174.9|14|2752470.0|4200
>>> 1669791600|655.35|1669793098|655.35|1669793098|11140.95|17|3342285.0|5100
>>> 1669878000|655.35|1669879500|655.35|1669879500|13107.0|20|3932100.0|6000
>>> 1669964400|655.35|1669966800|655.35|1669966800|10485.6|16|3145680.0|4800
>>> 1670050800|655.35|1670052899|655.35|1670052899|7864.2|12|2359260.0|3600
>>> 1670137200|655.35|1670194711|655.35|1670138996|7864.2|109|2359260.0|32700
>>>
>>> 1670396400|0.0|1670396403|655.350000000001|1670407500|37676.1049695061|287|11302831.4908518|86100
>>>
>>> 1672297200|0.0|1672297201|655.350000000001|1672323300|22253.0669985626|287|6675920.09956877|86100
>>>
>>> 1676098800|0.0|1676098802|655.350000000001|1676113800|28772.4393132542|288|8631731.79397624|86400
>>>
>>> 1676185200|0.0|1676185202|655.350000000001|1676209500|13341.363576159|268|4002409.07284769|80400
>>>
>>> 1676703600|0.0|1676703602|655.350000000001|1676716500|8775.40582191782|287|2632621.74657535|86100
>>>
>>> 1698991200|0.0|1698991202|655.350000000001|1699011600|19847.6247601028|288|5954287.42803082|86400
>>>
>>> 1699686000|0.0|1699686004|655.350000000001|1699711200|17135.218|287|5140565.40000001|86100
>>>
>>> 1701586800|0.0|1701586804|655.35|1701627947|15.2406976744186|287|4572.20930232558|86100
>>>
>>> Your thoughts, expertise and software is appreciated!
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/fe12e93e-a74a-4ce2-b7e5-980e378017fbn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to