"t...@tom.org" <t...@tom.org> writes:

> kk, glad you corroborated my observations. I am no expert in this for sure. 
> I am just tired of all of the comments I get from visitors to the website 
> about how my readings exceed theoretical max. I could remove the max, but 
> that doesn't seem fun.

I have added maxSolarRad to my db and am now looking at it.  This
morning, I saw values that exceeded theory right at dawn, then going
under theory after a while.  Two thoughts from this:

  Instruments are typically specified at something like 5% of full
  scale.  I just looked up the VP2 and that is exactly what it says.
  So that's 5% of 1800 W/m^2, or 90 W/m^2.  That's huge compared to
  morning levels.

  The theory is presumably for a sensor that is somewhat off the ground
  in an open area with not only no trees but no buildings.  A
  light-colored building nearby might reflect light from direct sun.

> I do not have the expertise to validate the way weewx calculates it nor am 
> I even competent in Python, but for those who may, here is a link to the 
> code:
>
> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/blob/d91635f3bc429f906d1f084c6a6bc8ee09fa1a27/bin/weewx/wxformulas.py#L332

Thanks.  That seems to refer to fairly old work (which doesn't mean it's
wrong, but it seems there has been a lot more attention paid to this
more recently).

With any luck someone can go over the various theory papers and
implement a few more algorithms.

This looks like the state of the art:
  
https://pvpmc.sandia.gov/modeling-steps/1-weather-design-inputs/irradiance-and-insolation-2/irradiance-data-sources-for-performance-modeling/national-solar-radiation-database/

but my guess is that using the Wikipedia article is going to be easier.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/rmilfdquejd.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to