Well, there is still low wind activity, but currently at least 5 km/h. And 
$current.beaufort 
shows 0 bft. $current_beaufort shows 1 bft, as it should. What is going on 
here? Maybe things change, when moving to gw1000 api driver?

 

> Well, I had to wait for some wind first. Now, after sunset, wind seems to 
> be growing. And this is the latest archive record:
>
> REC:    2020-07-23 20:50:00 CEST (1595530200) altimeter: 
> 29.94844953418796, appTemp: 64.63492618774067, barometer: 
> 29.897333333333336, beaufort: 0.4444444444444444, cloudbase: 
> 2464.8536620841987, dateTime: 1595530200, dewpoint: 53.68325395886734, ET: 
> 0.000133188221454822, extraTemp1: 133.6604, heatindex: 64.06666666666666, 
> humidex: 68.17774431413599, inDewpoint: 61.099461593234274, inHumidity: 
> 75.77777777777777, inTemp: 69.07777777777778, interval: 5.0, maxSolarRad: 
> 10.611708312518399, outHumidity: 69.0, outTemp: 64.06666666666666, 
> pressure: 29.83233333333333, radiation: 15.47888888888889, rain: 0.0, 
> rainEvent: 0.0, rainRate: 0.0, txBatteryStatus: 0.0, usUnits: 1, UV: 0.0, 
> windchill: 64.06666666666666, windDir: 171.3974954238297, windGust: 4.92, 
> windGustDir: 202.0, windrun: 0.08481481481481483, windSpeed: 
> 1.017777777777778
>
> At least, there is a value for beaufort. But it is still displayed as 0 
> bft in the skin. To be sure, I will have to wait for more wind, until 
> tomorrow.
>
> kind of curious
> Peter
>
> Am Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2020 15:20:06 UTC+2 schrieb gjr80:
>>
>> If you have beaufort in the loop packets then you should end up with 
>> beaufort in archive records. Does it work now? If not $current.xxxxx 
>> tags come from the archive record hence the suggestion to run WeeWX 
>> directly for at least a full archive period to confirm that beaufort is 
>> appearing in archive records.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Thursday, 23 July 2020 22:38:14 UTC+10, Vetti52 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Gary!
>>> Thanks for the hints. In deed, there is a value for beaufort in the loop:
>>> LOOP:   2020-07-23 14:16:36 CEST (1595506596) altimeter: 
>>> 30.065488730750573, appTemp: 69.20122805363343, barometer: 30.014, 
>>> beaufort: 1, cloudbase: 3824.7354273385445, dateTime: 1595506596, dewpoint: 
>>> 52.73310752508154, heatindex: 69.1, humidex: 72.72248011924633, inDewpoint: 
>>> 54.980122811806766, inHumidity: 64.0, inTemp: 67.6, maxSolarRad: 
>>> 820.4582989978796, outHumidity: 56.0, outTemp: 69.1, pressure: 29.949, 
>>> radiation: 604.7, rain: None, rainEvent: 0.0, rainRate: 0.0, 
>>> txBatteryStatus: 0.0, usUnits: 1, UV: 5.0, windchill: 69.1, windDir: 240.0, 
>>> windGust: 3.36, windSpeed: 1.34
>>>
>>> I did not wait for the REC: record.
>>> So then I should have a look into the skin/skin config. However, I use 
>>> the seasons skin with some translations of the descriptions into German and 
>>> just added the value, as Tom posted above. I put it into current.inc here
>>>   <div class="widget_contents">
>>>   <table>
>>>     <tbody>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.outTemp</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.outTemp</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.heatindex</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.heatindex</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.windchill</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.windchill</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.dewpoint</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.dewpoint</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.outHumidity</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.outHumidity</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.barometer</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.barometer (Trend: 
>>> $trend.barometer.formatted)</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>       <tr>
>>>         <td class="label">$obs.label.wind</td>
>>>         <td class="data">$current.windSpeed ($current.beaufort bft) 
>>> $current.windDir.ordinal_compass 
>>> ($current.windDir)<br/>$word_current_beaufort<br />Böen 
>>> $current_gust_beaufort</td>
>>>       </tr>
>>>
>>>
>>> gjr80 schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2020 um 04:54:16 UTC+2:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> If you have beaufort = prefer_hardware under [StdWXCalculate] then you 
>>>> should be seeing field beaufort in loop packets and archive records 
>>>> provided you have field windSpeed in the same packet/record. I would 
>>>> go back to basics as far as you can and run WeeeWX directly 
>>>> <http://weewx.com/docs/usersguide.htm#Running_directly> for at least 
>>>> an archive interval (you want to see at least one archive record) and 
>>>> observe the loop packets (lines starting with LOOP:) and archive records 
>>>> (lines starting with REC:) on the console. Do they have a field 
>>>> windSpeed and what is its value, do they have a field beaufort and 
>>>> what is its value? If you have windSpeed and no beaufort or have 
>>>> windSpeed and have an incorrect beaufort value then something is wrong 
>>>> and we need to dig deeper. If the loop packets/archive records are correct 
>>>> then the issue is downstream in the skin/skin config.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 20:55:37 UTC+10 Vetti52 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Tom!
>>>>>
>>>>> As there was almost no wind last week, I just tried to activate 
>>>>> $current.beaufort. I decided to show both values, such as 
>>>>> $current_beaufort 
>>>>> ($current.beaufort). However, the new value always shows (0), while the 
>>>>> other one looks ok to me. Do I have to drive another screw somewhere in 
>>>>> Weewx. The only place, I know, is the entry in [StdWXCalculate], which is 
>>>>> set to "prefer_hardware" as by default.
>>>>> It is not that bad, as the solution from @WindnFog 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/weewx-user/b7TqpYD9sxY/60NGeJEFDAAJ>works
>>>>>  
>>>>> as well. But, at least, the new solution should work too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juli 2020 18:25:06 UTC+2 schrieb Tom Keffer:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Beaufort is treated as a separate observation type, not an 
>>>>>> alternative unit. So, you should be able to use it like any other type. 
>>>>>> For 
>>>>>> example,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   <p>The current wind speed is $current.windSpeed, which is beaufort 
>>>>>> $current.beaufort.</p>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to plot it, you would need to put 'beaufort' in your 
>>>>>> database schema.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -tk
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:42 AM Vetti52 <drv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi you Weewx experts!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> first I would like to say, that my station ( a WS2900 clone) is not 
>>>>>>> that sophisticated, especially concerning wind speed and direction. 
>>>>>>> There 
>>>>>>> are many tall trees around, being closer than their 10fold height, so 
>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>> the wind is often much smoother and more disturbed than on top of the 
>>>>>>> trees. However, I still would like to compare the data to the data 
>>>>>>> provided 
>>>>>>> by local weather forecasters. Commonly the wind is announced in the 
>>>>>>> literally equation of the predicted Beaufort value. So, they talk of 
>>>>>>> "fresh 
>>>>>>> breeze", when wind with 5 bft is expected. Therefore I wanted to 
>>>>>>> display 
>>>>>>> the wind data in bft and its literal equivalent also. In Weewx 3 I 
>>>>>>> adopted 
>>>>>>> the solution found here:
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/b7TqpYD9sxY/discussion
>>>>>>> which works fine so far.
>>>>>>> After upgrading to Weewx 4 I found a new entry in 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [StdWXCalculate]
>>>>>>>     [[Calculations]]
>>>>>>>           beaufort = prefer_hardware
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which raised the question, if I could replace the previous solution 
>>>>>>> by that introduced in version 4.
>>>>>>> I expected, that there would be an option in the [[[Units]]] section 
>>>>>>> to chose 'beaufort' instead of 'knot'. But this is not offered in the 
>>>>>>> options there. Anyway, this would not be the solution, because I want 
>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>> see the wind speed as it is actually shown, and *in addition *in 
>>>>>>> terms of Beaufort. This should also be shown in an extra graph over 
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone have a clue, how to manage this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to weewx...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e766b133-65d4-4821-917e-49a31936a43do%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e766b133-65d4-4821-917e-49a31936a43do%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/1816ef8c-ccc2-440f-8dca-68939def8dd7o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to