On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:08:13 PM UTC+1, Phil Owers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 4:26:32 PM UTC+1, Phil Owers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 3:19:57 PM UTC+1, gjr80 wrote:
>>>
>>> In the daily summaries the 'max' field stores the max value of the obs 
>>> for the day (the row of the daily summary table) concerned. So for point in 
>>> time obs like temperature, humidity etc $year.outTemp.max will indeed 
>>> give the max outTemp value seen since 1 January of the current year and 
>>> $year.outTemp.maxtime will give the date-time it occurred. The same tag 
>>> will certainly work with rain, ie $year.rain.max but what that tag is 
>>> returning is not the max daily rainfall in the year to date but rather the 
>>> max rainfall seen in an archive period in the year to date, you are 
>>> treating rainfall more as a point in time observation. The $year.rain.sum 
>>> tag will give you the total rainfall in the year to date so it does not 
>>> help (it sums the daily summaries sum field). If you are looking for the 
>>> max daily rainfall in the year you want to look at the max of the sum 
>>> fields and to find the max value of the sum field you use the .maxsum 
>>> aggregation type in your tag ie $year.rain.maxsum. Date-time wise 
>>> $year.rain.maxtime may well provide the correct date-time that the 
>>> highest daily rainfall occurred (chances are high that the highest archive 
>>> period rainfall occurred on the day of highest total rainfall) but the 
>>> corresponding 'time' aggregate for .maxsum is .maxsumtime ie 
>>> $year.rain.maxsumtime.
>>>
>>> This may make a bit more sense if you refer to the Aggregation types 
>>> <http://weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#aggregation_types> appendix in 
>>> the Customization Guide.
>>>
>>> Assuming you are using the alltime period provided by the xstats example 
>>> search list extension, the $alltime portion of the tag simply allows 
>>> the underlying query to use the entire daily summary table rather than just 
>>> the current year, month etc so $alltime.rain.maxsum and 
>>> $alltime.rain.maxsumtime should give you the results you are after.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>
>> Have checked my weewx.sdb and ALL rain records have a lot of decimal 
>> places, not just the historical records but live records to
>> As an example 0.2mm looks always to be 0.00787405....
>> 0.4mm = 0.015748031.... 
>> Is this expected ????
>> Phil
>>
> Have also just compared the 2018 NOOA reports from weewx and weatherview. 
> Now 99% was imported to weewx but the Temp and Wind are spot on with each 
> other but the rain totals are about 25% lower in weewx compared 
> to weatherview. for all 7 completed months. Just thought I would mention it.
> And thanks for your help so far.
> Just worked out your conversion for above, but not sure yet why the rain 
> should always be about 25% lower
>
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to