I see dust and wind now :) No really, most of us users are not able to code this.
In my opinion: it is good to discuss this, and we can speak about alternatives. Working with text is not the badest option i think. And maybe some time somebody with more coding knowledge do the mqtt thing. I currently work some stuff out, but is always try and error. weewx is great and its free :) Thank you also for your great work mwall! Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2018 00:49:48 UTC+1 schrieb mwall: > > On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 5:59:40 PM UTC-5, vince wrote: >> >> >> So I'm hoping for a scenario that seeds a secondary db from a MQTT topic, >> in effect. Kinda like the MQTT 'out' extension Matthew wrote, just in >> reverse. >> > > exactly! we need an mqtt.py that contains an uploader, a driver, and a > service all in one package, as a single extension. then you can use the > part for the purpose you need. the maxbotix extension does part of this - > it is both a driver and a service. if you have a station already, you load > it as a driver to augment that. if you want to run multiple weewx > instances, then you can run it as a driver. owfs is the same way. > > so if someone is keen to make this happen before i get around to it (my > plate is beyond full right now), take a look at the weewx-maxbotix > extension for a simple example. > > m > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
