Hi Paul, >> Thanks for looking into this and bonus points for thinking of the maven >> users! > > I wish I was a Maven user.
What's keeping you? >> From what I see, the two frameworks in "Mail" are not being considered for >> maven builds. Meaning the maven build contains the version from "Core" for >> now. > > Maven and Ant building different frameworks—crazy! Indeed! >> To move forward we'd have to: >> >> * add a pom file to the "Mail" directory to build ERJavaMail in the new >> location >> * update the groupId in the ERJavaMail pom file >> * update the groupId in the dependencyManagement section of the main pom file >> >> Which will be easy to do, so I'd say: go ahead! > > Unfortunately, I don’t know the specifics of what to do for those steps, nor > can I test it. As such, here’s my revised plan: > > 1. Delete Frameworks/Mail/ERJavaMail. There have been no updates to this > point in the tree since it was moved there. > > 2. Update Build/build/build.xml to build Frameworks/Core/ERJavaMail. > > This should have zero Maven side-effects if Maven’s building off > Frameworks/Core/ERJavaMail. Yep, this will be better for the maven folks. Otherwise everybody would have to modify the ERJavaMail dependency since the groupId would change if we move it from "Core" to "Mail". Fabian > > -- > Paul Hoadley > http://logicsquad.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
