Am 09.03.2011 um 19:04 schrieb Mike Schrag: >>> Why couldn't one use a randomly generated unique ID that is ten characters >>> long (or so)? There *could* be name collision but the chances would be >>> small. Alternatively, why not invent a "context sequence" that starts at 1 >>> and counts up throughout the Request-Response loop? That would absolutely >>> be unique. >> I believe that is what they are ... a "context sequence" of sorts (^_^) >> Specifically, they are derived from the context().elementID(). I think how >> this value is created is that the first number is the contextID, followed by >> a '.', then each element increments the element id, and each nesting adds a >> '.' separator character. However, my understanding of it is likely imperfect. > this is the default behavior, but it's not required .. for instance, > ERXWORepetition uses the hashcode of each repetition item instead of the > child element index.
In case that this special handling is turned on via the various flags in ERXWORepetition are turned on. And I agree that this is a non-issue. Turn on gzip and forget about it. Cheers, Anjo _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
