Is this maybe a symptom of some kind of threading problem? The process that is 
running was recently updated but the older process was very similar and never 
exhibited this problem. I have never had an issue with the data in the database 
being different from what is logged out in the setters.

This process should probably be a long running task but I've never had it run 
that way before. It has generally taken 30-45 seconds to complete in the past.

Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS


On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Tim Worman wrote:

> Thanks Ken. No, all the relationships on both entities are allowed to be 
> null. I'm really at a loss to explain how I'm ending up with different values 
> in the database than I see going through the setters in the EO.
> 
> Tim Worman
> UCLA GSE&IS
> 
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> 
>> Do you have any mandatory to-one relationships?
>> 
>> Whenever I have situations where data is not what it's supposed to be, it 
>> ends up that EOF created other objects for me because of mandatory to-one 
>> relationships...  I don't know if this is still a problem, but it used to be.
>> 
>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Tim Worman wrote:
>> 
>>> I have a process that cycles through a bunch of EO's (foos), does some 
>>> math, creates related EO's (bars), and inserts the math values into the new 
>>> EO's. When I run this process and it cycles through all the foos but the 
>>> values that get inserted into bars are not correct. If I restrict the 
>>> process to only handling one foo instead of cycling through many, the 
>>> inserted values ARE correct.
>>> 
>>> I've tried inserting some console messages to see what values are passed to 
>>> the setters in bars. When I do this they are always correct but what ends 
>>> up in the database is different.
>>> 
>>> Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this and how I can better 
>>> diagnose it?
>>> 
>>> Tim Worman
>>> UCLA GSE&IS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com
>>> 
>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com
> 
> This email sent to [email protected]

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to