On 10/08/2010, at 11:33 PM, John Huss wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Paul Hoadley <[email protected]> wrote: > For the attribute that we may as well call the "birthday" attribute, I'm > using the "date" prototype from ERPrototypes. Curiously (IMHO), this > prototype has an external type of "TIMESTAMP", even though Postgres offers > the 1-day-resolution "DATE" type. In any case, I stuck with the prototype as > shipped. > > I would consider that a bug in ERPrototypes, since there is a dateTime > prototype, the date prototype only makes sense if it is different. But > fixing it is difficult since it could break everyone using it. Even so, it > wouldn't be the first time such a thing was done, and I am a proponent of > getting things right, as long as the community is sufficiently notified.
I wonder if it's incidental to the real problem, though, which is that EOF and Java have no 1-day-resolution date type. That is, and I haven't tested it (though it's on my list), I'm not sure that using PostgreSQL's DATE type would actually solve the problem. -- Paul. http://logicsquad.net/
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
