Does WO / EOF implement its own form of TPC or is it a case of buyer-be-aware / 
technology stack dependent?

Karl

On 2010-06-29, at 11:26 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

> These are in the same EOEditingContext transaction, but they're not in a 
> single database transaction ... EOF does not (currently) use JTA across 
> connections in multiple databases.
> 
> ms
> 
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
> 
>> On 2010-06-30, at 5:56 AM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello;
>>> 
>>> I have 5-6 models in an application.  Thus far this has worked out fine 
>>> because many database servers were employed and a socket or two to each was 
>>> not a problem.  Now the database servers have been consolidated and with 
>>> each model requiring a database connection, the number of connections to 
>>> one database server from all of the instances is actually quite large!
>>> 
>>> I have been reading the java-doc for the JDBC*/EO* classes trying to get my 
>>> head around how things work at the JDBC connection / transaction level.  
>>> What I would like to do is to modify the "Table Name" in the models to be 
>>> prefixed with the schema name and then to somehow see if I could use one 
>>> connection and hence coalesce each transaction commit/rollback across all 
>>> of the models.
>>> 
>> 
>> As far as I heard (may be wrong), it's possible to have EOModels connecting 
>> to different databases. They have to fall under the same EOModelGroup only 
>> then it can be treated under single transaction. (Correct me if I'm wrong).
>> 
>> For each model, the jdbc connection properties can be setup individually.
>> 
>> dbConnectURLGLOBAL
>> dbConnectUserGLOBAL
>> dbConnectPasswordGLOBAL
>> 
>> I don't remember but I guess they are used like 
>> 
>> dbConnectURL.Model1
>> dbConnectUser.Model1
>> dbConnectPassword.Model1
>> 
>> Or something similar. Someone experienced out there can point out the exact 
>> properties.
>> 
>> Farrukh
>> 
>>> My guess is that this concept is not how EOF works and I'm probably not 
>>> going to be able to do it without also coalescing the models together.
>>> 
>>> Has anybody any insights?
>>> 
>>> cheers.
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Andrew Lindesay
>>> www.silvereye.co.nz
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/farrukh.ijaz%40fuegodigitalmedia.com
>>> 
>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com
>> 
>> This email sent to [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kgretton%40mac.com
> 
> This email sent to [email protected]

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to