heh, it's not. :) I also don't believe that sometimes having an optional to-one is always a "thing to fix". However, I do understand now that EOF doesn't handle this case much better than it did in WO4.
-Lon On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Mark Ritchie <mark.ritc...@mac.com> wrote: > On 14/Jan/2010, at 10:41 AM, Tom M.Blenko wrote: >> I think you need a better example because I'm left wondering how/when >> PartAttribute and Part rows get created and deleted. If some process outside >> your control is doing that the to-many is off the table and there are other >> issues that need to be addressed. If there aren't other processes outside >> your control, why not right the wrongs of the original design? > > Here here! Changing the unlaying structure would certainly be preferable if > that's an option. ;-) > M. > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
