The obvious exception being Gwandalu...Guwundo... Hazelnut. But that is yet to be released, so it doesn't count in their favor.
Cheers, Anjo Am 24.11.2009 um 21:21 schrieb Mike Schrag: > I was just in the midst of typing the same thing. Almost all of our new > deployments will be on Linux in a VM infrastructure. And I don't need Apple > to provide me anything. I can't really think of a WO enhancement that can't > be done by a 3rd party. IMO, for the past 5 years, the community has brought > far more interesting enhancements than Apple has. What are you expecting > Apple to provide to you that Wonder doesn't provide to you RIGHT NOW, in an > open development process. > > ms > > On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Anjo Krank wrote: > >> Jesus. Apple will do what they want. Nothing you, I or anybody else says or >> does will make much of a difference. Nor should we really care, it's not >> like they did something useful in the last 5 years or so. >> >> You sound like they were some sort of rain god. "Let's show we are loyal, or >> else HE might smite us like the flies we are!" >> >> Cheers, Anjo >> >> >> >> Am 24.11.2009 um 20:36 schrieb Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists: >> >>> If we want Apple to release new WebObjects versions, beyond 5.4.3, to the >>> community, the worst thing we can do is talking about Windows and Linux. We >>> should be very clear about this: if we expect Apple to do anything for us >>> in the regard, we should be loyal to Apple by only developing and deploying >>> on Apple equipment. Otherwise, I am afraid that 5.4.3 will be the last >>> version we will ever see... >>> >>> With Kind Regards, >>> >>> Dennis Gaastra, >>> Chief Technology Officer, >>> WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc. >>> >>> >>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the >>> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not >>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender >>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and >>> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be >>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, >>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions >>> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail >>> transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy >>> version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, >>> BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2009-11-24, at 10:19 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: >>> >>>> 1) The customer sometimes is willing to compromise and give you a Linux >>>> box ... deployment on Linux is as easy as Mac more-or-less. So, if they >>>> won't let you use Mac, ask if you can use Linux.... and setup CentOS or >>>> RHEL on it. >>>> >>>> 2) Project Wonder has source for Adaptors. I see IIS adaptor source in >>>> there. No idea how good it is: >>>> >>>> /Wonder/Utilities/Adaptors/IIS/ >>>> >>>> HTH, Kieran >>>> >>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Ralph Scheuer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>> >>>>> due to the fact that some of our customers use Windows servers, I would >>>>> be interested how others deploy their WO apps on Windows these days... >>>>> >>>>> The wiki only refers to Apache when it comes to WO 5.4 on Windows and >>>>> does not mention IIS... >>>>> >>>>> However, some customers need specific IIS features like Single-Sign-On >>>>> via ActiveDirectory or do not want another web server for political >>>>> reasons. >>>>> >>>>> How do you deal with that? >>>>> >>>>> Is it still possible to use the old 5.2 adaptors (CGI or ISAPI) with >>>>> modern IIS versions and WO 5.4? How about 64-bit-ness? >>>>> >>>>> Would it be possible to set up WO 5.2 and just replace all the frameworks >>>>> with the 5.4 equivalents so that at least the CGI adaptor >>>>> (WebObjects.exe) from the old version works? >>>>> >>>>> Has Apple ever released the source of the Windows adaptors so that they >>>>> could be recompiled for 64-bit IIS? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your input. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.com >>>>> >>>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40webappz.com >>>> >>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/anjo%40krank.net >>> >>> This email sent to [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
