El sábado, 22 de septiembre de 2012 22:36:44 UTC-3, VP escribió: > > I figured out what I would call a bug.
I'm not sure it's a bug. It would if, for example, the documentation said it's possible to do field calculations without passing all the involved parameters. I belive this is not the case. I've tested the .update_record method with trunk and it updates just the provided fields, leaving calculated field as before when there are not enough parameters to update it. Yet, I agree that it would be better to handle this updates even without the required data automatically, as an enhancement. --
