Thankks a lot
2012년 6월 15일 금요일 오후 3시 37분 8초 UTC+9, Anthony 님의 말:
>
> db.define_table('person',
>> Field('name'),
>> Field('phone'), # ---> [‘000-000-1234’,'001-001-1245', ‘three’,
>> ‘banana’]
>> Field('email'), # ---> {‘office’: 'y...@gmail.com', ‘home’:'
>> n...@yahoo.com'}
>> )
>>
>
> For now, you could do something like:
>
> db.define_table('person',
> Field('name'))
>
> db.define_table('phone',
> Field('person', db.person),
> Field('number'))
>
> db.define_table('email',
> Field('person', db.person),
> Field('type'),
> Field('address'))
>
> Or to simplify, you could get rid of the 'phone' table and add 'phone' as
> a list:string field to the 'person' table:
>
> db.define_table('person',
> Field('name'),
> Field('phone', 'list:string'))
>
> Eventually, you might also get rid of the 'email' table and instead add a
> Postgres hstore 'email' field to the 'person' table, but the DAL doesn't
> support that yet. Another option might be MongoDB, though again, the DAL
> doesn't yet support storing dictionaries within a single field. There are
> some other options as well.
>
> Anthony
>
