Setting up SNI on Apache is quite straightforward. If anyone has any problems, ask in this thread and I'll try to help.
Upside: - dedicated IP isn't needed - it works in all major browsers and OSes Downside: - SNI on Windows XP should work in Firefox, Opera, etc. but not in IE (it will work in IE in Vista or later) That's the biggest downside in my book, looking from the client's perspective - it doesn't work in Android 2.x default browser, works in Android 3 and 4 - it doesn't work with python 2's ssl, urllib and httplib modules (this could only be a problem if you use these modules to access such a site, it won't affect building a site in web2py). We're using SNI on quite a few sites, since we need to support a large number of virtual hosts. Since IPv4 IPs are getting scarce these days, be prepared to get more and more recommendations to use SNI from your hosting providers... Regards On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:36:18 PM UTC+2, Anthony wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:08:20 PM UTC-4, Ross Peoples wrote: >> >> I wouldn't know the first thing about setting up SNI, so I would tell >> WebFaction that if they will do it for me and it works, then sure, I'll use >> SNI, otherwise stick with what you know. >> > > I think in this case, "what you know" (i.e., dedicated IP address) is an > extra $5/month. The downside of SNI, though, is that it appears not to be > supported on Android 2.x (also not on Windows XP). SSL will still > technically work on those clients, but will result in a certificate error > being displayed. > > Anthony > >