2012/5/5 Tiago Almeida <tiago.b.alme...@gmail.com>: > Don't know why one does not use an oodbms. I've never used one. Are there > any serious alternatives to current rdbms? > Two of them are quite good albeit complex. http://www.db4o.com/?src=ODBMS-sidebar http://www.eyedb.org/
But there is a problem with those they implement a standard that is now developed by the OMG through the ODBT WG. OMG is famous for creating too complex standards that are dead before arrival, to name the two most well known: - CORBA - UML A record track that casts shadows on a standard that is going to reach version 4 and has been adopted very little. mic
