I believe in what you speak.
Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
Web Developer
ovidio...@gmail.com
ovidiomari...@itjp.net.br
ITJP - itjp.net.br
83 8826 9088 - Oi
83 9334 0266 - Claro
Brasil
2012/3/29 monotasker <scotti...@gmail.com>
> I'm not convinced that the stats you cite about Python are statistically
> meaningful over a one-year period (2.45% decline?). But it seems to me that
> on the web the key issue is browser integration. JavaScript is the default
> language of the web because browsers all interpret it internally. PHP,
> you'll notice, also saw a small decline in these stats. I think that's
> related to the desire to do as much as possible in the browser
> (client-side). As long as that is the push, and as long as Python doesn't
> have client-side support built-in, it will always be in a second-class
> position on the web. I actually think that one of the strengths of Python
> is that it doesn't have to run on a server--it can work equally well with a
> native local interpreter. But so far in web development we have treated it
> as a drop-in replacement for PHP (and so as server-dependent) rather than
> as a language to run locally on the client.
>
> That said, I think the expansion of the Python web ecosystem beyond Django
> can't but help the language's profile. This is not to slam Django, but as
> long as a language is perceived as a one-framework show (like Ruby and
> rails) it will tend to have trouble making converts.
>
> Ian
>
>
> On Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:42:08 AM UTC-4, Ovidio Marinho wrote:
>>
>> The fall of the python's fault Django and Python 3.0?ht**
>> tp://www.tiobe.com/index.php/**content/paperinfo/tpci/index.**html<http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
>> Web Developer
>> ovidio...@gmail.com
>> ovidiomari...@itjp.net.br
>> ITJP - itjp.net.br
>> 83 8826 9088 - Oi
>> 83 9334 0266 - Claro
>> Brasil
>>
>>
>>
