Bruno,
Yes, it would seem that the only two options right now would be to
implement a document type (which I'm not sure how time consuming that would
be), or normalize that table and extract that dictionary/document into its
own table -- which could be annoying since I have several tables like that.
Thx for input.
Best,
Ruben
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 2:03:25 PM UTC-5, rochacbruno wrote:
>
> This is the Mongo Adapter types definition, I see no type 'dict' maybe it
> needs a new type "document'.
>
> class MongoDBAdapter(NoSQLAdapter):
> uploads_in_blob = True
>
> types = {
> 'boolean': bool,
> 'string': str,
> 'text': str,
> 'password': str,
> 'blob': str,
> 'upload': str,
> 'integer': long,
> 'double': float,
> 'date': datetime.date,
> 'time': datetime.time,
> 'datetime': datetime.datetime,
> 'id': long,
> 'reference': long,
> 'list:string': list,
> 'list:integer': list,
> 'list:reference': list,
> }
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, rdodev <ruben.or...@infotechfl.com> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to define a mongo table in db.py that looks something like
>> this:
>>
>> {
>> field1 : "super",
>> field2 : "super",
>> things = { this : "stuff", that = "stuff" },
>> field3 : "Give me a call"
>> }
>>
>> defining fields1-3 is easy, but what's the syntax to build 'things' which
>> itself is a dictionary (see above)? Your help is much appreciated.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bruno Rocha
> [http://rochacbruno.com.br]
>
>
