If anyone is interested I found assembla.com which allows unlimited repositories, with unlimited members for both public and private projects.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Massimo Di Pierro < massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > No problem at all Daniel, I welcome the discussion. I am just saying > do not get upset if I am slow on this side. ;-) > > On Dec 22, 12:59 am, Daniel Aguayo Catalán <daniel.agu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > > I hate all changes related to this topic. This is because I have to > > > learn a new system and do extra work to move stuff around. There was a > > > lot of push for git and github so we did it. > > > > > Please, let's not open this can of worms again. The costs of changing > > > outweighs the benefits. > > > > > Massimo > > > > He he, don't worry :). My apologies if this topic is still kind of > > sensible. I thought that bitbucket was more restrictive and the free > > private project hosting was a plus and killer feature over other > > services, at least for me (that sadly have not gitourious nor github). > > So I just wanna to know a comparison of bitbucket and github from your > > perspective to choose my personal repo, but now I can see that was > > nothing in particular. > > > > I know that github is the 'pop-choice' for project hosting these days > > and I have no problem with that (gitorious.org and bitbucket has fairly > > same workflow as github), so please don't considerate this as a kind of > > flame of DVCS hosting. > > > > Thanks to all for your answer. > > Best regards > > -- > > Daniel > -- -- Regards, Bruce Wade http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade http://www.wadecybertech.com http://www.warplydesigned.com http://www.fitnessfriendsfinder.com
