Please show us the code (the man and two controllers).

On Oct 12, 3:09 am, apple <simo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have updated issue 454 which was previously closed.
>
> This works with ajax=True (seems to work with multiple tables too
> though I have not fully tested) if you have a separate controller for
> each table. However:
>
> 1) It does not work with ajax=False and ajax_trap=True. In this case
> clicking a paginate button opens a new page.
>
> 2) If you have a more complex controller then paginate does not work
> as it does not pass the table name. e.g. if my controller does
> <<return grid(db[request.args(0)])>> then paginate buttons will not
> work as the table name is not passed as a parameter.
>
> On Oct 11, 9:30 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > If an ajax grid does work please open an issue on google code so I can
> > check it and we can fix it. I cannot reproduce your problem otherwise.
>
> > On Oct 11, 1:12 pm, apple <simo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Surely there must be a solution to this? It does not seem logical to
> > > have a component that is arbitrarily restricted to one per page?
>
> > > iframe is not a good solution. And I don't think LOAD with ajax works
> > > with multiple grids and pagination - certainly it does not work in my
> > > application even after the recent fix in trunk. I have got multiple
> > > grids to work with LOAD and no ajax, including the add/view/edit but
> > > not pagination.
>
> > > Surely there are many possible solutions to this without compromising
> > > the URL benefits you mention. For example you could include a "gridid"
> > > in request.args or request.vars; maybe also save the grid parameters
> > > in session.
>
> > > On Oct 11, 3:44 pm, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:49:51 AM UTC-4, stefaan wrote:
>
> > > > > (workaround: e.g. use iframes, or design a better UI that doesn't need
> > > > > two grids in one view ;)
>
> > > > Using ajax components might be better/easier than iframes.

Reply via email to