I have tested bulbs with Rexster and while they are great products with an equally great community, there are some existing incompatibilities that prevent usage of OrientDB's remote engine. This is the only one that allows multiple connections to a db as well as the built-in clustering capabilities. It is being worked on to my understanding and will work in the future.
With regards to bulbs, it is really cool stuff but so abstract that you cannot take advantage of many of OrientDB specific features. Namely, schema, indicies work differently, possibly others I cannot think of. I love the whole Tinkerpop stack and Rexster/bulbs, will definitely use them, but not sure if it's a clean fit for an OrientDB --> web2py specific adapter. The concept of being able to use bulbs for all of those datastores would bring even more flexibility so it's rather appealing in that sense. -David On Sep 3, 7:16 pm, Vasile Ermicioi <elff...@gmail.com> wrote: > what do you think if we will write and adapter on top of rexter (or > bulbflow)? we will have an adapter for all rexster graph databases > (TinkerGraph, Neo4j, OrientDB, DEX, and Sail RDF Stores) > > http://code.google.com/p/orient/wiki/ProgrammingLanguageBindings#Lang...https://github.com/tinkerpop/rexster/wikihttp://bulbflow.com/
