On Windows 7 with Python 2.7, I get an immediate traceback, and then the
thum's start -- but it just keeps going without getting to a "reporting
task". Here's the entire output (I broke this one after 11 thum's, but ran
another one for over 30 thum's):
thumnew task
starting task
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "meta_scheduler.py", line 140, in <module>
MetaScheduler().loop()
File "meta_scheduler.py", line 133, in loop
self.report_task(task,self.async(task))
File "meta_scheduler.py", line 56, in async
p.start()
File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\process.py", line 104, in start
self._popen = Popen(self)
File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 244, in __init__
dump(process_obj, to_child, HIGHEST_PROTOCOL)
File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 167, in dump
ForkingPickler(file, protocol).dump(obj)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 224, in dump
self.save(obj)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save
self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 419, in save_reduce
save(state)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save
f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 649, in save_dict
self._batch_setitems(obj.iteritems())
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 681, in _batch_setitems
save(v)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save
f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self
File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 40, in dispatcher
self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 401, in save_reduce
save(args)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save
f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 548, in save_tuple
save(element)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save
self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 419, in save_reduce
save(state)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save
f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 649, in save_dict
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
self._batch_setitems(obj.iteritems())
File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 347, in main
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 681, in _batch_setitems
self = load(from_parent)
save(v)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 1378, in load
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save
return Unpickler(file).load()
self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 858, in load
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 419, in save_reduce
save(state)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save
dispatch[key](self)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 880, in load_eof
f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 649, in save_dict
raise EOFError
EOFError
self._batch_setitems(obj.iteritems())
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 681, in _batch_setitems
save(v)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save
self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 396, in save_reduce
save(cls)
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save
f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self
File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 748, in save_global
(obj, module, name))
pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <type 'thread.lock'>: it's not found as
thread.lock
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
thum
^C
Anthony
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 7:39:51 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Trying to isolate the problem... can any windows user run the
> following test for me?
>
> get trunk
> cd web2py/gluon
> python2.6 meta_scheduler.py
>
> (python 2.7 should be ok too)
> you should get the following text repeated ...
> --- begin ----
> starting task
> task started
> thum
> thum
> thum
> thum
> thum
> reporting task
> --- end ---
> after a few cycles press [ctrl+c]. Do you get a traceback? Do all new
> task - reporting task pair up in the output?
>
> Massimo
>
> On Aug 31, 8:45 am, António Ramos <ramst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > the -K option is only for 2.6 but with python 2.6 i have that screenshot
>
> > with error until i break it with ctrl c
> > after that the task runs only the first time and not the other 2 as your
> > demo on Vimeo
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > 2011/8/31 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo....@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Did the previous version work?
> >
> > > On Aug 31, 4:11 am, António Ramos <ramst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > i reported the same problem.
> > > > Web2py works very well so far except this sheduler.
> > > > I have windows 7 machine and python 2.6 and 2.7
> >
> > > > 2011/8/31 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo....@gmail.com>
> >
> > > > > Do you have these errors only with the scheduler?
> > > > > Does everything else in web2py works well?
> >
> > > > > I am rewriting the scheduler completely but there seems problems
> with
> > > > > the multiprocessing module.
> > > > > I think the problem is due to this:
> >
> > > > >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3405397/python-multiprocessing-doe.
> > > ..
> >
> > > > > Massimo
> >
> > > > > On Aug 30, 11:25 pm, Brian M <bmer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Similar results with a fresh install of Python 2.7.2 I don't
> think
> > > this
> > > > > is
> > > > > > just due to a bad python install.
