Thanks Richard and pbreit for your input. pbreit -- what you describe is similar to what I was thinking of. And yes, it would be nice if there were a standardized way to do this.
Richard, since Bitbucket is acting as my central repo, I'll need to pull from bitbucket to the production server. But you're correct that it doesn't need to be under VC on the server. Thanks again to both of you for your input. On Aug 8, 4:54 pm, pbreit <pbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I actually just have a regular repo on the production server and do an "hg > pull; hg update". I'm not sure if that's the best approach but it has worked > so far on my low volume site. But I can see that there could be issues and I > suspect that is why many people update to other locations and then set sym > links (or whatever). > > I would be happy to hear suggestions for improvement.
