Nice,but anthony is right when the application grow, you have the situation that describe anthony.
2011/5/2 Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> > On Monday, May 2, 2011 10:33:59 AM UTC-4, pbreit wrote: >> >> Right, but I get no benefit then. > > > If you've got models that are needed by multiple controllers, then there's > no benefit to be had -- all your models will have to be run on every request > anyway. The benefit comes if you've got some models that are only needed for > specific controllers or functions -- in that case, you run only the models > you need for the specific request, and that can save some time/memory. If > you need a particular model only for a few functions, but those functions > are scattered across multiple controllers, then yes, this new change will > not help -- for that, we'd need a more sophisticated router functionality. I > take it, though, that the router approach would likely involve more effort > to design and implement, so what we've got now is a quick change that will > provide nice benefits for a lot of use cases, even if it's not yet as > flexible as a full router based approach. > > Anthony > -- http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar
