Congratulations! I'm really fond of the web2py framework. In fact, after having used both web2py and django, I am very biased towards web2py. I think that you simply *get* it, and you did a excellent job, and you keep on doing great work.
But I think that this has to be taken with extreme caution: What does this *really* say about web2py? Most of all, beware: I think that a very big pro for django is that in stackoverflow.com there are 16k questions on Django, so this may mean that a lot of questions get answered there instead of being asked in the django mailing list. Regards, Esteban On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Massimo Di Pierro < massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is another plot adding Ruby on Rails data (rubyonrails-talk) > > http://i.imgur.com/sPLzH.png > > we passed them too as messages/month since Dec 2010. > According to this (http://rubyonrails.org/community) rubyonrails-talk > is the main Rails list for users. > > Massimo > > On Apr 3, 7:08 pm, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't have exact numbers, but over the past 11 months, I think the > web2py > > Google Group membership has grown by over 50%. By contrast, it appears > the > > Django Google Group membership has grown by only about 10%-15%. I guess > > there's a reason there were three April Fools jokes on Reddit targeting > > web2py. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, April 3, 2011 7:53:35 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > > I mined some data from: > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/about > > >http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/about > > > > > This web2py users group had 56,283 messages posted since 1/1/2009. The > > > Django-users list had 51,119 over the same time period. > > > > > Here is a plot showing the messages/month in the two users groups > > >http://i.imgur.com/GHcce.png > > > As you can see the surpass is significative and consistent since Oct > > > 2009. > > > > > Now we know why some people are upset about web2py ;-) > > > > > Congratulations to all of you! > > > > > Massimo >
