This is patched. There is not more "active." it is auth.signature.is_active and the latest plugin_wiki uses auth.signature
On Mar 6, 12:42 pm, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Massimo > > Sorry to keep raising the subject of plugin.wiki fields, but could you > please patch the 'active' field so we can try and test and use it. > Unless I've misunderstood something, it doesn't even exist at the > moment! > > Thanks, D > > On Mar 4, 2:12 am, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I see what you mean, it could cause a little confusion if people think > > it is referring to the table. There again, you were originally happy > > to use 'active', so now maybe you are getting too picky :-) > > > Maybe 'functional', 'switched_on', 'ready'. > > My own previous choice was 'activated' and I'm still happy enough with > > that. > > > On Mar 3, 9:42 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > I do not like > > > > db.table.is_active = True > > > > although I do not strongly oppose either. > > > is this any better? > > > > db.table.enabled = True > > > > or > > > > db.table.disabled = False > > > > On Mar 3, 3:08 pm, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > And of course 'is_active' matches 'is_public'... > > > > > On Mar 3, 4:33 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Suggestions for a better name? > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:21 pm, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I think you may have deleted field 'active' by mistake. If you re- > > > > > > instate it, could you call it something else please :) > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 10:02 pm, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for the upgrade. My immediate issues are... > > > > > > > > *** Reserved fieldname 'file' is still a problem (change to > > > > > > > filename?) > > > > > > > *** check_reserved=['all'] -- not working in DAL??
