sorry, my mistake!
On Jan 29, 4:01 pm, Miguel Lopes <mig.e.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: > gluons/tools.py > > Txs, > Miguel > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Niphlod <niph...@gmail.com> wrote: > > call_or_redirect() is the real "addition" here .... you can use both a > > URL or a function to manage on_failed_authentication and > > on_failed_authorization ... take a look in gluon/utils.py > > > On Jan 28, 1:48 am, miguel <mig.e.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I suppose this is mentioned in the Change Log by: > > > "on_failed_authorization can be a function, thanks Niphold" > > > > How is this used? could the function be a lambda, does it take params, > > > is it an action (i.e. a controller function)? > > > > Also, is it possible to allow the usual login redirection in case it > > > is not a service call? I'm thinking in these lines: > > > > def theFunction(): > > > if request.function == 'call': > > > # return case forservice call > > > else: > > > # redirect to login form > > > > This would be useful for publishing the same service both for browsers > > > and for other apps, like it is mentioned in p:// > >www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/48 > > > (see "Authentication"). This solution would also be useful for other > > > non-browser-based clients. Would it work? How is the function used? > > > > Txs, > > > Miguel > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> > > > Date: Sep 23 2010, 2:34 pm > > > Subject: web2py basic auth > > > To: web2py-users > > > > Against trunk please. It is ok if you just send me a replacement file. > > > I will diff and study it. > > > > On Sep 23, 8:52 am, Niphlod <niph...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Never done a patch before, but I think in the night (here are 3PM) I > > > > can manage to have a first draft. > > > > > I'd have to test it out, but for the beginning .. What wuold be the > > > > patch against ? tools.py in trunk or tools.py in 1.85.3? > > > > > On 23 Set, 14:52, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > > > You are right. That would be best. Want to send me a patch? > > > > > > On Sep 23, 2:26 am, Niphlod <niph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >
