Jonathan, can you explain a bit more about how the new routes would work on some examples? How would the mappings below (just /c/f/args) look like with the new routes? /_ah/xmpp/message/chat/ -> /comm/jabber /new-article -> /post/create /about -> /article/2010/07/11/welcome-to-my-world /article/2010/11/02/new-world-order -> /article?year=2010&month=11&day=02&title=new-world-order /article/2010/11 -> /article?year=2010&month=11 /author/smith -> /author?name=smith /publisher/smith/update -> /publisher-update?name=smith
> I'll be checking in a new feature in a day or two that allows you to define app-specific routers in the root routes.py. I thought the goal is per application routes control for better modularity/portability of apps. If so, global route management should be minial and limited to the mapping to applications only. I don't think any local/per application rules should be there. What is the reason why in your proposition e.g. controllers of the default app are specified in global routes instead of having them in the local ones?
