Maybe they think you are watching youtube videos :p
On Dec 30, 1:04 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > I will amend my will to release the book under an open source license. > > You guys really think my "heirs" even know what I do in front of the > computer all day? > > Massimo > > On Dec 29, 10:26 am, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Also, what about the book? Would the community have to start from scratch on > > new documentation? The online version says "modified content cannot be > > reproduced." > > > Anthony > > > On Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:21:20 AM UTC-5, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, December 29, 2010 5:49:17 PM UTC+11, Magnitus wrote: > > > >> Wow, some heavy duty concerns in this thread... > > > >> I'm not fully versed in the detailed legalities of those things, but > > >> I'll elaborate things as I understand them and perhaps I can be > > >> corrected if I'm wrong... > > > >> Basically, I get Web2py under the GLP licence. > > > >> Under that licence, I can: > > > >> 1) Use and distribute the unmodified web framework indefinitely as > > >> long as I provide a copy of the licence and the source code > > > >> 2) Modify the source code of the Framework as I see fit as long as > > >> long as I make an open source copy of my modification available with > > >> an original copy of the licence and indicate how it was modified from > > >> the original source > > > >> The above would apply to any copy I downloaded when the licence was in > > >> force, even if say, Massimo was struck by a meteor and Web2py stopped > > >> being distributed under such a licence. > > > >> So, the main worry isn't that if Massimo is eaten by raiding > > >> cannibals, people won't have the legal means to distribute future > > >> modified copies of Web2py, but rather that nobody may have the > > >> expertize or interest to do so, correct? > > > > It is an open question whether distribution of such modified copies are > > > legally allowed to still be called web2py if Massimo has sole legal rights > > > on the name. Thus, you may be able to do that, but you likely would have > > > to > > > call it something other than web2py. > > > > Graham > > > >> On Dec 28, 12:28 pm, mdipierro <mdi...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > >> > Afoundationis a corporation and, believe it or not, in US a > > >> > corporation is a person: > > > >> > http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2010/01/the... > > > >> > The Djangofoundationwas created two years ago (and Django is 4-5 > > >> > years older thanweb2py). Do you have any evidence that it has > > >> > improved its popularity: > > > >> > http://www.google.com/trends?q=django? > > > >> > Python has afoundationand it looks to me it is always broke. I just > > >> > spoke with a recruiter that was looking for Python programmers for a > > >> > big US bank and I complained that his client relied on a product > > >> > (Python) and did not make any donation to support it. The python > > >> > developers are not supported by thefoundation, as far as I know. > > > >> > Afoundationhas costs higher than a corporation and I do not get > > >> > enough donation to cover those costs. A corporation > > >> > (experts4solutions) is cheaper (it still costs at least $500/year of > > >> > my own money). Moreover afoundationimplies that design decision are > > >> > taken by committee and I do not believe in that. > > > >> > I consult with core developers and users on important matters but I > > >> > think there has to be one individual who ultimately takes decisions > > >> > about the direction of the project. > > > >> > We have explored the possibility of joining the free software > > >> > conservatory but we got no feedback. > > > >> > Rails is owned by a corporation (37signals) which is owned by one > > >> > individual. It seems to be the model works well for them. In my case I > > >> > decided not to pass copyright and trademark to experts4solutions > > >> > because I thought some would have criticized it. > > > >> > I am not the only committer to the mainweb2pybranch. Jonathan L. is > > >> > also a committer and will use his power in case I am incapacitated. > > >> > Yet, that should not be a crowded space in order to avoid internal > > >> > conflicts. > > > >> > I will write a will that explains what happens to theweb2pytrademark > > >> > and copyright in case I die. > > > >> > Massimo > > > >> > On Dec 28, 2:12 am, Graham Dumpleton <graha...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:37:30 PM UTC+11, mdipierro wrote: > > > >> > > > Not sure what a single person framework means. This framework > > >> > > > counts > > > >> > > > almost 100 contributors and at least 50 people very skilled here. > > >> > > > If > > >> I > > >> > > > get hit by a track any of them can take over by forking my branch > > >> > > > as > > > >> > > > allowed by the license. > > > >> > > That last line actually supports the idea that a piece of software is > > >> owned > > >> > > and controlled by a single person. If a piece of software was owned > > >> > > by > > >> a > > >> > > group, be it a corporation or afoundation, the death of the core > > >> developer > > >> > > would make no difference as it would continue to be developed within > > >> the > > >> > > structure of that corporation orfoundationand copyright still held by > > >> the > > >> > > continuing entity. > > > >> > > In your case, if you get hit by a bus driven by a disgruntled Python > > >> > > developer, then no one else can simply take over the software as it > > >> > > is > > >> now, > > >> > > using any existing legal structure etc. Instead it would as you say > > >> need to > > >> > > be forked and in being forked legally may even need to change names > > >> > > as > > >> a > > >> > > result if you have sole rights over the original name. > > > >> > > So, your own words support the contention expressed by some that it > > >> > > is > > > >> > > 'single person framework' as far as ownership and control is > > >> concerned, an > > >> > > issue which is distinct from whether or not you have other > > >> contributors. > > > >> > > Graham > > > >> > > > The purpose of thefoundationis to collect money for development and > > >> > > > advertising. Other organization like Rails have chose to create a > > >> > > > company instead of afoundation. > > > >> > > > We have created a company (experts4solutions.com) whose purpose is > > >> to > > >> > > > promote skilledweb2pyprofessionals (and you can joins), foster > > >> > > >web2pyprojects, sell consulting and long term support contracts. > > > >> > > > This was advertised here a few months ago. Some users have joined. > > > >> > > > Massimo > > > >> > > > On Dec 27, 9:46 pm, Pepe Araya <pep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > Hi, > > > >> > > > > some news about this topic? > > > >> > > > > I think 2 things are going in favor of creating afoundationor > > >> > > > [whatever]: > > >> > > > > 1. the community has grown a lot. > > >> > > > > 2. in all the reviews I read aboutweb2py, always, always, > > >> ALWAYS!!! say > > >> > > > it > > >> > > > > is a single-person framework and that takes away the future > > >> security of > > >> > > > > their development. > > > >> > > > > kind regards > > > >> > > > > Pepe- Hide quoted text - > > > >> > - Show quoted text -
