> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Anthony > Sent: 12/17/10 02:30 AM > To: web2py-users > Subject: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... > > On Dec 16, 6:14 pm, "Branko Vukelic" <branko.vuke...@gmx.com> wrote: > > Reading the full text of the Apache license, I think dual-licensing web2py > > under GPLv2 > > and Apache License 2.0 would solve all of the problems except 1: reuse of > > web2py > > components and libraries for building closed-source software. For me, > > personally, that > > would not be fair game. If you are taking apart web2py and building > > something useful, > > you should share. > > Now that there's a truly standalone DAL, what if someone wants to use > that in an application? What about some of the other contrib modules, > like markmin?
This is a question only Massimo can give a qualified answer to. The following is merely my opinion: Yes, they should share the code. They wouldn't be _required_ (if you ask me), but they should. If they modify it in any way, or source the code from it, they should share both DAL _and_ their app. -- Branko Vukelic branko.vuke...@gmx.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/ http://flickr.com/photos/foxbunny
