It's exactly I mean...Thank you.

On 27 nov, 02:13, DenesL <[email protected]> wrote:
> The book navigation could be improved, and I mentioned this recently
> to Massimo; specially for the majority of us that still depend on it.
> For example, the general index entries do a search of the term instead
> of taking you directly to where it is defined, not very efficient. If
> I want to find something fast I have to use my PDF copy but alas, it
> does not include the latest features.
>
> Reading the group posts is a great way to learn and more so if you try
> to answer some of them; time consuming, yes, but learning requires
> some commitment.
>
> Denes.
>
> On Nov 26, 7:36 pm, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:54 PM, oncle_bob
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I like web2py product but I don't recommend it. The documentation and
>
> > To each their own, eh? :)
>
> > > features flow is too spreaded and too speeded. Why don't you publish
> > > the book and documentation in html files, it's easier to check
> > > features and API point. The book reading is not fun to read and search
>
> > You'll find both the book and the API docs in the documentation
> > section. I would've sworn that's the first place anyone would look,
> > but I guess I'd be wrong. :)
>
> > Online book:http://web2py.com/book
> > API:http://www.web2py.com/examples/static/epydoc/index.html
> > API section in the book:http://web2py.com/book/default/chapter/04#API
>
> > > anything. If I don't read the group, I miss a lot of. Developper can't
> > > spend all time to read group ;) every day.
>
> > Some of us are obviously happy with reading this list. :)
>
> > --
> > Branko Vukelić
>
> > [email protected]
> > [email protected]
>
> > Check out my blog:http://www.brankovukelic.com/
> > Check out my portfolio:http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/
> > Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/)
> > I hang out on identi.ca:http://identi.ca/foxbunny
>
> > Gimp Brushmakers Guildhttp://bit.ly/gbg-group
>
>

Reply via email to