Not sure I understand the problem. Can you provide a test case and what you expect?
On Oct 13, 5:07 pm, Alexandre Andrade <alexandrema...@gmail.com> wrote: > The book says about auth_permission: > > auth_permission links groups and permissions. A permission is identified by > a name and, optionally, a table and a record. For example, members of a > certain group can have "update" permissions on a specific record of a > specific table. > > But in 1.87.2, Its requires a table to works. its limits the use of > permissions, while make easy when it applies to a table. > > I think it was enforced to make the form easier, but its not cool. > > What I can expect? Fix to work optionally with tables, or I will have to > manage my own solution? > > Atenciosamente > > -- > ========================= > Alexandre Andrade > Hipercenter.com
