Yes, indeed :) I might say it was almost intentional, but I wouldn't want to give myself too much credit.
On Oct 11, 6:59 pm, Richard <richar...@gmail.com> wrote: > <shudder> - that is awful! > > On Oct 12, 5:37 am, weheh <richard_gor...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > LOL. Let there be chalices! (Hope nobody minds ... just having some > > quick fun. Don't expect this to go anywhere.) > > > See crude prototype (web2py-ish color > > scheme):https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0BzPqKovYWlw-NThhOTVkMTktZGVjOS00Mzdj... > > > On Oct 11, 10:50 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 11, 2010, at 12:05 AM, weheh wrote: > > > > > I know it's late, but I've got it! The logo should be a simulacrum of > > > > the "Holy Grail". Why? Because web2py is the "holy grail" of web > > > > frameworks. And because python is associated with Monty Python, and > > > > Monty Python is strongly associated with "Monty Python and the Holy > > > > Grail". So make the logo a beautiful chalice. G'nite all. > > > > I think you've got it, Richard. I like the new design a lot, but I don't > > > know how we could have missed this. > > > > images.jpeg > > > 8KViewDownload > > > > (And we could rename the framework "Grails".) > >
