You might probably want to read this too.. just came across this link:-

http://stuff.techwhack.com/9840-oracle-high-mysql-pricing
<http://stuff.techwhack.com/9840-oracle-high-mysql-pricing>and this:-
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/08/oracle_jacking_up_mysql_prices/

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Michele Comitini <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I feel positive.  Oracle's behavior reminds me of the Caldera/SCO
> affair some years ago.  Please look where SCO is today.
> Also remember how good it was when Mozilla foundation took over after
> netscape for our browsing experience?
> Oracle's business has  been "sailing" to a dead end?  I bet so, but
> that is something we should not care much about.
> MySQL will be able to improve a lot when driven by  the needs of
> developers and not by a single company,
> so making a open MySQL fork is the thing to work for.
> I expect great things for the future of the office suite, which will
> be finally more component oriented and easier to integrate as
> a library.
>
> mic
>
> 2010/10/11 cjrh <[email protected]>:
> > On Oct 11, 4:38 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> This all happened in less than 2 months:
> >
> > Yes, ofc.
> >
> > OpenSolaris was the first to go.  The future of MySQL is looking
> > suspicious.  OpenOffice has already become "Libre Office" as published
> > by the "Document Foundation":
> >
> > http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/
> >
> > The lawsuit of Oracle against Google is for their (Google's)
> > implementation of the Dalvik lookalike Java runtime, which apparently
> > breaks the conditions of the Java open-source licence.  It turns out
> > that in order to use the Java open-source licence, one has to
> > completely implement the entire Java specification.   If only a subset
> > is implemented, the open-source licence no longer applies.   It is
> > insane.   It seems Java was never really true open-source to begin
> > with, and it sounds like the opportunity to go after Google was one of
> > the carrots in the Oracle-Sun takeover to begin with.
> >
> > Hence the appeal of more straightforward, easy-to-understand licences
> > such as the WTF licence:
> >
> > http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
> >
> > :)
>

Reply via email to