I'm not sure if he was suggesting it as a solution for the community as much as asking about it for his purposes.
If you use tables a lot, the html might be clutered, but if you follow the tips in this article and keep the tags to a minimum (using css for the styling & layout), then html is not so bad (well, I did use html years ago when we had to work with tables so my definition of 'not so bad' might be warped): http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/08/from-table-hell-to-div-hell/ Really, for the html, you are left with: The bare minimum necessary tags, their classes, ther ids and maybe their custom data. Not so bad. Javascript can already placed in different files and is cross-browser compatible with jQuery. Its an overhead, but a necessarity one if you want to create interactive client-side content or use AJAX. The main problem (at least from my perspective) is the css (or more specifically, the need to make your page look consistent across several browsers with css) and I don't see an easy way to avoid it if you want your page to look good. Its up to the browser developping companies to get their act together. Templating solutions won't help you there. On Oct 2, 7:27 am, "Martin.Mulone" <mulone.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > in my opinion we have already a template system, another one or mix > with web2py is to complicate things. Perhaps not, but sure we are > going to have people writing python code in javascript block, and > javascript in python block. > > On 2 oct, 02:10, yamandu <yamandu.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, I found thishttp://www.embeddedjs.com/ > > > Haven´t teste yet, but looks interesting. > > The goal is help by letting code html/javascript code cleanner by > > using templates > > similar to web2py templates. > > > I always almost get crazy when writing html/javascript code. > > It always get confusing and this might help. > > > Anyone knows it? > > I think I can imagine some cons, do you too?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
