Indeed. This needs some work. I will send a patch soon. On Aug 13, 2010 10:43 AM, "Jonathan Lundell" <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:19 AM, mdipierro wrote: > @elfuogo1, let us know if the problems are solved. ... Following up on Mr Freeze's comment, IS_STRONG is a bit problematical, or at least it doesn't fit so well into the pattern of the other validators. There's no good way to translate its messages, for example, without reducing them to a single message (which isn't at all what it does by default). I don't have a solution, but it might be worthwhile documenting its quirks. > > On Aug 12, 10:36 pm, "mr.freeze" <nat...@freezable.com> wrote: >> IS_STRONG is failing for a d...
