What you want to do is exactly Jquery Ajax -
$(#table2).load(Path_To_your_Data) , or Try using JQGrid , (There is JqGrid
Plugin too).

What i am doing Right now is 3 Tables , with One table having 16000 Rows ,
which are Directory list , computed in server side (Archive recursive
Extraction , Directory recursive Listing , etc).

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>wrote:

>
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Jason Brower wrote:
>
> > Is this because you have large amounts of data?
> > When I has some work, we used TCL for the pages.  TCL loads as you go.
> > This is because back in the day webbrowsers we nasty slow and it sent
> > the data as it came.  Now-a-day we create the page remotely and then
> > send the entire thing.
> > If your working with large amounts of data then concider loading the
> > page with ajax or with good ol pagination.  At least that's how I feel
> > about it.
>
> In the long run, I'll invoke Ajax, for a variety of reasons. But what I'm
> trying to do is to load a page with two tables, the first being short &
> sweet, the second taking several seconds (perhaps as much as 30) to compute,
> server-side.
>
> I want the browser to render the page header and the first table and then
> wait for the second table to arrive, rather than waiting for the whole page.
> The reason I asked about chunking the page is that it's the way that Google
> does it. I recommend this talk to everyone on this list; it's quite
> interesting:
>
> Velocity 09: Google's Marissa Mayer, "In Search of... A better, faster,
> stronger Web
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFsQvcdmLxc
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Jason Brower
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 21:35 -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> >> On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
> >>
> >>> You mean ajax?
> >>> You can do this using Ajax.
> >>> In Jquery:
> >>> $(#div_id).load(Path_To_Your_Page)
> >>
> >> No, I meant just serving a regular (dynamic) page. I'm not using Ajax.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 7/23/10, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>>> It'd be nice to be able to return a dynamic page in (controlled)
> chunks. I
> >>>> have no idea how the interface to something like that might work....
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to