On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Johann Spies wrote: > I am not an experienced web developer but I have always valued the > output from validator.w3.org. > > After being disappointed with the output I received when validating a > web2py app I built, I checked out http://www.web2py.com and it > reported even more errors: > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.web2py.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.1 > > Is it worth while to try and get a "clean" report from this website?
In my view, yes. Some of the stuff is trivial (providing img alt= for example). And I think that XHTML Strict isn't such a great choice (not that the site validates as anything else). The new welcome app almost validates, IIRC.
