On Jul 7, 2010, at 3:14 PM, mdipierro wrote: > Right now you can do links with > > url > [[name url]] > [[name #anchor]] > [[name url#anchor]] > [[name page:slug]] > > and define an anchor with > > [[anchor]] > > If I understand your suggestions: > 1) also allow > [[url]] > [[url#anchor]] > [[#anchor]] > [[page:slug]] > to allow un-named links. Q: how can a link not have a name?
In your notation, I was thinking: [[slug]] would imply [[slug page:slug]] 'slug' would be used verbatim as the name, and with slug-encoding as the slug. A link would always have a name; it would just be implicit. That's the Mediawiki convention, though they use a vertical bar to separate an optional name from the slug. > > 2) use [[=anchor]] to define an anchor to avoid conflict with 1. > > if we do 1, we must do 2 but I would prefer [[!anchor]] then. Sure. Or [name:anchor], which corresponds to the html that it generates.
