Sorry but, any thoughts?

Carles

El 22/06/2010, a las 19:56, Carles Gonzalez <carle...@gmail.com> escribió:

> My english is horrible, an maybe it wasn't clear, but that was exactly
> my problem :).
> 
> Currently i'm looking at the code massimo told me about but i think
> that the problem isn't here.
> 
> I explain: the parent is assigned when the child entity is created (at
> the constructor level), to ensure all entities on the same group are
> stored together (or close), that way transactions are feasible.
> 
> I don't think i'm capable of doing that right now, but my proposed
> soultion (just an idea) is to extend the field definition syntax for
> reference fields, adding an atribute to indicate this tipe of
> relationship.
> 
> Example (blatantly stolen from the book):
> 
> db.define_table('person',
>                    Field('name'))
> db.define_table('dog',
>                    Field('name'),
>                    Field('owner', db.person, relationship="parent"))
> 
> On SQL databases that attribute would be ignored, but in GAE web2py
> would enforce the parent relationship at creation and dog[id].parent
> would return the result of dog_instance.parent()
> 
> I don't know if this is feasible or if i'm total crazy (an option to
> consider). Opinions?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Matt <mjwat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any chance this could be considered as well?
>> 
>> Currently the DAL doesn't allow you to set the parent which is
>> required for GAE entity groups.
>> 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/3c11deb2bfadf207/96a4324e5fd0cf71?lnk=gst&q=GAE+parent#96a4324e5fd0cf71
>> 
>> On Jun 22, 7:35 am, Carles <carle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll try.
>>> 
>>> Carles
>>> 
>>> El 21/06/2010, a las 19:03, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> escribió:
>>> 
>>>> The only file you need to look into is gluon/contrib/gql.py
>>> 
>>>> specifically the select() function which calls filter returns the Rows
>>>> object
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 21, 11:55 am, Carles Gonzalez <carle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Ok, thanks! I would like to make the patch myself, but the innards of
>>>>> web2py are somewhat complex...
>>> 
>>>>> Thanks again, Carles.
>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:43 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Probably it would not be hard to implement. I will look into this next
>>>>>> week but if somebody sends me a patch before that I will take it.
>>> 
>>>>>> Massimo
>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 21, 9:25 am, Carles Gonzalez <carle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>>>>> I have developed some applications in web2py, and 2 are running
>>>>>>> currently in gae, but now i have serious problem.
>>> 
>>>>>>> My current project is a social application, and when i design
>>>>>>> (example) the tables to make an user follow the actions other user
>>>>>>> (twitter like) I find that many-to-many relationships in app-engine
>>>>>>> are not easily supported.
>>> 
>>>>>>> From my understanding using the tools present in web2py right i would
>>>>>>> need to do a lot of processing in memory, an that would hurt
>>>>>>> performance greatly.
>>> 
>>>>>>> The pattern proposed by app store developers uses lists and "parent"
>>>>>>> relationship:
>>> 
>>>>>>> class Message(db.Model):
>>>>>>>     sender = db.StringProperty()
>>>>>>>     body = db.TextProperty()
>>> 
>>>>>>> class MessageIndex(db.Model):
>>>>>>>     receivers = db.StringListProperty()
>>> 
>>>>>>> indexes = MessageIndex.all(keys_only = True).filter('receivers = ', 
>>>>>>> user_id)
>>>>>>> keys = [k.parent() for k in indexes)
>>>>>>> messages = db.get(keys)
>>> 
>>>>>>> For using that pattern in web2py I would need a method for specifying
>>>>>>> the parent of a model instance. Can I specify that relationship using
>>>>>>> any method I don't know? If not, would it be hard to implement?
>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!

Reply via email to