Sorry but, any thoughts? Carles
El 22/06/2010, a las 19:56, Carles Gonzalez <carle...@gmail.com> escribió: > My english is horrible, an maybe it wasn't clear, but that was exactly > my problem :). > > Currently i'm looking at the code massimo told me about but i think > that the problem isn't here. > > I explain: the parent is assigned when the child entity is created (at > the constructor level), to ensure all entities on the same group are > stored together (or close), that way transactions are feasible. > > I don't think i'm capable of doing that right now, but my proposed > soultion (just an idea) is to extend the field definition syntax for > reference fields, adding an atribute to indicate this tipe of > relationship. > > Example (blatantly stolen from the book): > > db.define_table('person', > Field('name')) > db.define_table('dog', > Field('name'), > Field('owner', db.person, relationship="parent")) > > On SQL databases that attribute would be ignored, but in GAE web2py > would enforce the parent relationship at creation and dog[id].parent > would return the result of dog_instance.parent() > > I don't know if this is feasible or if i'm total crazy (an option to > consider). Opinions? > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Matt <mjwat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Any chance this could be considered as well? >> >> Currently the DAL doesn't allow you to set the parent which is >> required for GAE entity groups. >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/3c11deb2bfadf207/96a4324e5fd0cf71?lnk=gst&q=GAE+parent#96a4324e5fd0cf71 >> >> On Jun 22, 7:35 am, Carles <carle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ok, I'll try. >>> >>> Carles >>> >>> El 21/06/2010, a las 19:03, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> escribió: >>> >>>> The only file you need to look into is gluon/contrib/gql.py >>> >>>> specifically the select() function which calls filter returns the Rows >>>> object >>> >>>> On Jun 21, 11:55 am, Carles Gonzalez <carle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Ok, thanks! I would like to make the patch myself, but the innards of >>>>> web2py are somewhat complex... >>> >>>>> Thanks again, Carles. >>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:43 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Probably it would not be hard to implement. I will look into this next >>>>>> week but if somebody sends me a patch before that I will take it. >>> >>>>>> Massimo >>> >>>>>> On Jun 21, 9:25 am, Carles Gonzalez <carle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>> >>>>>>> I have developed some applications in web2py, and 2 are running >>>>>>> currently in gae, but now i have serious problem. >>> >>>>>>> My current project is a social application, and when i design >>>>>>> (example) the tables to make an user follow the actions other user >>>>>>> (twitter like) I find that many-to-many relationships in app-engine >>>>>>> are not easily supported. >>> >>>>>>> From my understanding using the tools present in web2py right i would >>>>>>> need to do a lot of processing in memory, an that would hurt >>>>>>> performance greatly. >>> >>>>>>> The pattern proposed by app store developers uses lists and "parent" >>>>>>> relationship: >>> >>>>>>> class Message(db.Model): >>>>>>> sender = db.StringProperty() >>>>>>> body = db.TextProperty() >>> >>>>>>> class MessageIndex(db.Model): >>>>>>> receivers = db.StringListProperty() >>> >>>>>>> indexes = MessageIndex.all(keys_only = True).filter('receivers = ', >>>>>>> user_id) >>>>>>> keys = [k.parent() for k in indexes) >>>>>>> messages = db.get(keys) >>> >>>>>>> For using that pattern in web2py I would need a method for specifying >>>>>>> the parent of a model instance. Can I specify that relationship using >>>>>>> any method I don't know? If not, would it be hard to implement? >>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance!