This is great! You guys did such a nice job, many kudos!

--
Thadeus





On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM, b00m_chef <r...@devshell.org> wrote:
> Great job!  I am happy to see web2py apps that don't just use the
> default admin interface design, and actually do their own.
>
>
>
> On May 11, 2:40 am, Adi <aditya.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I saw some discussions flying around about web2py applications and
>> users out there (http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/
>> thread/606b6e90744ab3b5)
>> and thought it would be a good time to talk about my application.
>>
>> Radbox (http://radbox.me) is a video bookmarking service. Its still a
>> very young product, but I believe its pretty good at what it does.
>>
>> Right now we're using web2py 1.77.3 for the application.
>>
>> It has quite a few interesting features from a web2py developer's
>> perspective:
>>
>> - custom auth_user table
>> - Facebook integration for sign-up and (very very soon) publish to
>> wall
>> - generic embedded video display using swfobject
>> - Twitter @anywhere integration (this is only in the view layer using
>> javascript)
>> - url rewrite using routes.py
>> - RSS feed (only for users, not visitors)
>> - Ajax "Like" and "Archive" implementation for every video
>>
>> Many other things are under development. I mentioned the above because
>> lots of questions in this group are asked about these features.
>>
>> Please take the app for a test drive, let me know your feedback and
>> questions on the implementation. My team and I are more than happy to
>> recommend web2py for full-blown professional web applications, and
>> we'll continue to bug this community (specially Massimo and Theadus)
>> every time we hit a rough patch. :)
>

Reply via email to