This is great! You guys did such a nice job, many kudos! -- Thadeus
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM, b00m_chef <r...@devshell.org> wrote: > Great job! I am happy to see web2py apps that don't just use the > default admin interface design, and actually do their own. > > > > On May 11, 2:40 am, Adi <aditya.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I saw some discussions flying around about web2py applications and >> users out there (http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/ >> thread/606b6e90744ab3b5) >> and thought it would be a good time to talk about my application. >> >> Radbox (http://radbox.me) is a video bookmarking service. Its still a >> very young product, but I believe its pretty good at what it does. >> >> Right now we're using web2py 1.77.3 for the application. >> >> It has quite a few interesting features from a web2py developer's >> perspective: >> >> - custom auth_user table >> - Facebook integration for sign-up and (very very soon) publish to >> wall >> - generic embedded video display using swfobject >> - Twitter @anywhere integration (this is only in the view layer using >> javascript) >> - url rewrite using routes.py >> - RSS feed (only for users, not visitors) >> - Ajax "Like" and "Archive" implementation for every video >> >> Many other things are under development. I mentioned the above because >> lots of questions in this group are asked about these features. >> >> Please take the app for a test drive, let me know your feedback and >> questions on the implementation. My team and I are more than happy to >> recommend web2py for full-blown professional web applications, and >> we'll continue to bug this community (specially Massimo and Theadus) >> every time we hit a rough patch. :) >