My take. Keep things separate. I got the book both times and knowing the source had a lot if not the majority of weight in my decision. I think that more input to a site such as web2pyslices is a good complement for the book.
On May 7, 5:23 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > LOL. > > People who ask to be editors of the book and have proven > qualifications can email me and ask permissions. for now everybody can > add wiki pages to the book and they are editable. > > On May 7, 4:18 pm, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote: > > > I do not want to go in and clean up "trash" if there is a way to > > prevent it from getting there in the first place. > > > -- > > Thadeus > > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Patrick <arcaneli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 7, 12:32 pm, waTR <r...@devshell.org> wrote: > > >> I was just wondering if there are plans to open the book wiki to > > >> editing to everyone (even if you don't create an account). There is no > > >> danger in doing that...there are plenty of people who will clean up > > >> any garbage... > > > > You would be surprised. Many sites that did allow editing without > > > logging in have either disabled editing or you now have to get > > > permissions/authorization to do so. Personally I don't feel it should > > > be opened up for anonymous editing. Doing so would just add more work, > > > I'd rather have Massimo and the rest of the guys focusing on web2py. > > > (Just my 2 cents)
