good point
On Apr 12, 12:33 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:23 AM, mdipierro wrote: > > > ps. I am not suggesting we use the new html5 features yet (like > > forms). Only the doctype (google does it) and make sure it w3c > > validates. > > I'm not sure that Google is the best example to > follow:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.google.com > > > > > On Apr 12, 12:10 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:59 AM, mdipierro wrote: > > >>> should we replace in welcome > > >>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http:// > >>>www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> > > >>> with > > >>> <!DOCTYPE html> > > >>> pros? cons? > > >> HTML5 is still a draft, not a standard. Validation tools tend not to > >> support it (BBEdit is a case in point). > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
